Sources and gaps
Where each cell came from, and the list of everything left empty
Every figure on this site comes from one of two places: the register entry for a permit number, or the operator's own terms of service, with the clause number where the operator gives one. Nobody here holds an account, places bets or reports experience of their own. Where a document could not be read, the cell says so instead of being filled from somewhere else.
Two sources, and nothing else
Every number printed on this site comes from one of two documents.
The first is the register entry for a permit. For Curaçao that is a certificate page on cert.cga.cw; for Anjouan it is the Anjouan Gaming Board's public register listing. What that source supplies is the issuing authority, the permit number, the holder company and, sometimes, a status field.
The second is the operator's own terms of service, together with the policies it publishes alongside them. What that source supplies is the verification clause, the withdrawal ceiling, the coin list and the barred-country list — each with the clause number wherever the operator numbers its clauses.
There is no third source. No aggregator, no other comparison site, no operator marketing page is used to fill a cell. The records behind this table were read on 26 August and 2 September 2026.
What nobody here did
Nobody writing this site holds an account with any operator named on it. Nobody has deposited money, requested a withdrawal, submitted an identity document or contacted a support desk at any of them.
No figure anywhere is described as tested, measured or personally confirmed, because none of them is.
That matters most in the column readers care about. A verification threshold on this site is a number inside a clause, not a number someone hit. If a page says documents may be requested at any amount, that is what the clause says — it is not a report of what happened to anyone.
The same applies to the game. Nobody here has run a seed check on a published round, which is stated plainly on the page about seed-checkable rounds.
The rule for an empty cell
The table prints three different kinds of blank and keeps them apart on purpose.
"Not published" means the document was read and says nothing on that point. It is a statement about the operator's document, and making it requires having read that document.
"Not read" and "list not read" mean the document could not be read on that point at all. It is a statement about us, not about the operator, and it forbids any conclusion about what the operator does.
"Case by case" is not a blank. It means the operator published a policy of asking for documents whenever it chooses, which is an answer — the answer "at any amount" — and it is printed as one rather than being folded into the empties. That distinction is worked through on the page about when the documents are asked for.
None of the three ever means zero, and none ever means unlimited.
Everything this site could not read
Named rather than left implicit, because a methodology page that lists no gaps is not a methodology page.
No game data at all. The facts library behind this network holds a hundred operators and fifteen fields each, and not one field concerns games: no title, no count, no studio-by-game map, no return figure. Nothing on this site therefore claims that a named operator carries a named game. The two adjacent signals it does have — an in-house originals tag on 20 operators of 100 and outside studio lists for 33 — are described on the page about in-house games and outside studios.
No published payout row. No operator in our table publishes its multiplier row in any document we read, so no page here prints a row of values as if it were sourced. The row is described structurally instead, on the page about the payout row.
No return figures. Not for a configuration, not for a game, not for a lobby.
No payout speeds. None of the eleven records carries a published processing time, so no page states one.
Two coin lists absent from the record: Bitcasino.io and Bitsler. Two barred-country lists unread: Vave and Flush. One verification policy unread: Flush. Four studio lists unread: Vave, Rocketpot, Metaspins and Shuffle. One withdrawal ceiling read and absent: Metaspins, whose limits clause names none. Seven withdrawal-limit documents not read at all: Vave, DuckDice, Rainbet, Shuffle, Wolf.bet, Bitsler and Flush — which leaves three published ceilings, at Bitcasino.io, Wild.io and Rocketpot.
Two permit links that resolve to the operator rather than to a register: Rocketpot's and Wolf.bet's. A third, Vave's, resolves to the register's front page rather than to a certificate. All three are named on the page about permits and registers.
How the eleven were chosen
Not by preference, and not by what any of them pays.
The set is drawn from the facts library by a rule that can be restated in one sentence: the operator carries the in-house originals tag — the only game-related signal the library has — its record was actually read rather than marked unreadable, and its permit names an issuing authority. Ordering within the set is by a fixed count of evidence checks: a permit number, a register link that resolves somewhere other than the operator's own site, a named holder company, a published verification figure, a clause number for it, a published ceiling, a readable coin list, and whether the record was read live.
The denominator of that count is the same for every operator. An operator that publishes less scores lower rather than being scored out of fewer checks, which is the arithmetic error that would otherwise promote whoever discloses least.
An operator whose permit status reads revoked is not ranked at all.
The paid placement
Vave is a paid placement on this site. It is labelled as one in the table, the link to it is marked as advertising, and this page names it again here so the disclosure does not depend on anyone reading a table footnote.
It is not ranked against the others and it is given no cell it cannot fill.
What its record actually contains: a Curaçao permit numbered OGL/2024/1676/0905, held by Latcas B.V., issue date 19 May 2025, status Active — but a register link that goes to the front page rather than to a certificate. A coin list of six names. A verification policy at clause 8.7 that reserves the right to ask for documents before any payout. No withdrawal ceiling. No barred-country list we could read. No studio list. No tags of any kind, which is why it is the one row in the table that does not carry the originals tag.
Several of those are the weakest entries in their columns, and they are printed as such. A paid placement is a reason to disclose, not a reason to describe a thinner record as a thicker one — and the comparison table is built so that it cannot be.
Corrections
A figure here is true as of the date the document behind it was read, and the documents change. A register status can be updated the day after it is copied; a clause can be renumbered in a new edition of the terms.
Where a page states a number, it states where the number came from, so a reader who finds a different one in the current document can see exactly which claim has aged.
If something on this site is wrong, the useful form of that report names the page, the figure and the document that contradicts it. The correction then goes to the page, not to a change log nobody reads — and if a document turns out never to have been readable in the first place, the cell goes back to being blank rather than being quietly filled from a second-hand source.