Plinko casino sites: the game is the same, the cashier is not
The board is identical wherever you meet it, so it cannot tell one plinko casino site from another. What can is the row of numbers underneath it, and everything the operator writes about getting money back out. Eleven operators here, five columns, and every column filled from a permit register or from the operator's own terms.
Every description of Plinko starts at the top: a ball is released, it strikes a pin, it goes left or right, it does that once per row, and it lands. That account is complete and it is also useless for choosing where to play, because it is the same account at every site.
An illustration, not an operator’s screen. The slot figures painted on the cabinet are decoration: this site prints no operator’s paytable, because no operator publishes one where we could read it.
This site starts at the other end — at the row of bins the ball lands in.
Sixteen balls, one board
Sixteen releases down an eight-row board. Nothing steers them and nothing is weighted — the heap builds in the middle because more routes end there, and that is the only reason.
That row is the only part of the game the operator writes down in advance. It is a list of multipliers, printed left to right, symmetrical about the middle, with its largest numbers at the two ends and its smallest in the centre. It is published before the round rather than discovered during it, and it is rewritten in full whenever the row count or the risk setting changes. The payout row is the closest thing the game has to a document.
How often, against how it pays
The upper row is how often each bin is reached. The lower row is the shape of the price list printed underneath it — the same row, read backwards. The lower row carries no figures here on purpose: a multiplier is a statement about one operator’s game, and no operator in this table publishes one where it could be read.
Everything else worth comparing is a document too — and none of it is about the game.
Why the board cannot tell these sites apart
A Plinko board is a few hundred lines of code and a picture. It behaves the same in every lobby, it is frequently the same build from the same studio, and no operator has a version of it that pays differently by accident.
How many routes end in each bin
1
8
28
56
70
56
28
8
1
The counts under the bins of an eight-row board: 1, 8, 28, 56, 70, 56, 28, 8 and 1, and they add up to 256. Multiply two by itself eight times and you have every route down. The end bins are reached by one route each; the middle by seventy.
So a comparison of "which site has the better Plinko" has nothing to compare.
What is genuinely different between two sites showing the same board is the plumbing behind it: who issued the permit and whether that permit has a number in a register, at what point identity documents are demanded, how much money is allowed out in a week, which coins the cashier accepts, and which countries the operator's own terms refuse. Those five things vary enormously across the eleven operators below — far more than anything on screen does.
Eleven operators, five columns, and every column filled from the operator's own terms or from the register that issued its permit. None of these columns is about the game: the facts library behind this network has no field for games at all, so nothing here claims which titles a site carries. Two of the eleven print a verification threshold; three print a withdrawal ceiling. An empty cell means the document was not read, or the operator published nothing there. It never means zero, and it never means no limit.
Vavepaid placement
Permit
Curaçao Gaming Authority
Before ID check
case by case
Withdrawal ceiling
not read
Coins
6
Countries barred
list not read
Bitcasino.io
Permit
Curaçao Gaming Authority
Before ID check
2,500 EUR
Withdrawal ceiling
1,000,000 USDT a weekcl. 6.10
Coins
not read
Countries barred
1
Rocketpot
Permit
Curacao
Before ID check
US$2,500
Withdrawal ceiling
5,000 USD a monthcl. 11.5
Coins
13
Countries barred
34
DuckDice
Permit
Anjouan Gaming Board
Before ID check
case by case
Withdrawal ceiling
not read
Coins
10
Countries barred
16
Metaspins
Permit
Curaçao Gaming Authority
Before ID check
case by case
Withdrawal ceiling
not published
Coins
8
Countries barred
58
Rainbet
Permit
Anjouan Gaming Board
Before ID check
case by case
Withdrawal ceiling
not read
Coins
9
Countries barred
11
Shuffle
Permit
Curaçao Gaming Authority
Before ID check
case by case
Withdrawal ceiling
not read
Coins
6
Countries barred
15
Wild.io
Permit
Curaçao Gaming Authority
Before ID check
case by case
Withdrawal ceiling
100,000 USD a weekcl. 9.6
Coins
12
Countries barred
45
Wolf.bet
Permit
Government of the Autonomous Island of Anjouan, Union of Comoros
Before ID check
case by case
Withdrawal ceiling
not read
Coins
13
Countries barred
48
Bitsler
Permit
Curaçao Gaming Authority
Before ID check
case by case
Withdrawal ceiling
not read
Coins
not read
Countries barred
1
Flush
Permit
Anjouan Gaming Board
Before ID check
not read
Withdrawal ceiling
not read
Coins
9
Countries barred
list not read
Vave is a paid placement and is marked as one in the table. Its row is filled from the same two sources as every other row — the register entry for its permit and its own terms — and it is not ranked, not scored against the others and not given a cell it cannot fill.
The permit, and what its number is worth
All eleven rows carry an authority and a number, which is better than the library average: across the hundred operators on file, 68 have a licence number and 32 do not.
Seven of the eleven hold a Curaçao permit, four an Anjouan one.
A number is not a verdict. It tells you a register entry exists and can be looked up; it tells you nothing about whether a withdrawal will be paid. Two of the eleven share more than a jurisdiction: the number OGL/2023/111/0069 and the holder Moon Technologies B.V. appear on the record for Bitcasino.io and again for a sister brand outside this table. One permit, two front doors. What a number does and does not establish is worked through on the page about permits and registers.
Two figures out of eleven
The column that readers open the table for is the verification threshold, and it is nearly empty.
Bitcasino.io writes €2,500 at clause 6.6. Rocketpot writes US$2,500 at clause 11.4. Nobody else in the set names an amount.
The remaining nine are not silent, though, and the table distinguishes the two states. Eight of them publish a policy that says, in substance, that documents may be requested at any time and before any payout at the operator's discretion — Vave at clause 8.7, Shuffle at 4.1, Metaspins at 9.7, Bitsler at 4.3, Rainbet at 5.2 and 8.3, DuckDice and Wolf.bet in their KYC sections, and Wild.io in a policy that names no clause. That is a published answer, and it is the answer "at any amount". Flush alone publishes nothing on the point we could read, and its cell says so. The difference between those two states is the subject of the page on when the documents are asked for.
Three ceilings, and no two alike
A large multiplier is only interesting up to the amount the cashier will release, and that ceiling is published by three of the eleven. Of the remaining eight, one — Metaspins — has a limits clause that was read and holds no ceiling, and seven have no limits document on file at all, so their cells read “not read” rather than “not published”.
They are not comparable as printed. Bitcasino.io writes 1,000,000 USDT a week at clause 6.10. Wild.io writes US$100,000 a week at clause 9.6. Rocketpot writes US$5,000 a month at clause 11.5 — a figure two hundred times smaller than the first, in a different currency, over a different period.
Across the full library only 14 operators of 100 publish a ceiling at all, in four different currency forms over four different periods. Setting those numbers side by side without their currency and period would be a table lying about its own data, which is why the withdrawal ceilings get a page of their own.
The columns that are nearly full
Two columns behave differently from the rest, because operators treat them as marketing rather than as legal text.
Nine of the eleven publish a coin list, ranging from six names to thirteen. Wolf.bet and Rocketpot print thirteen each; Vave and Shuffle print six. Across the library the list could be read for 30 operators of 100 — the number of accepted coins is the field operators are most willing to publish and the field that separates them least.
The barred-country list runs the other way. Metaspins names 58 countries, Wolf.bet 48, Wild.io 45, Rocketpot 34, and Bitsler names exactly one. Two operators in the table have no readable list at all, and their cells say "list not read" rather than implying they accept everyone — a distinction the page on barred countries turns on entirely.
Add rows, add bins
89
1213
1617
Eight rows give nine bins, twelve give thirteen, sixteen give seventeen. The row count is the one control that changes the arithmetic rather than the price list — and it changes it by making the ends rarer, not by making them pay more.
What this site will not tell you
It will not tell you that a particular number of rows or a particular risk setting is better. No operator publishes the figure that claim would need, and inventing one would be worth less than an empty cell.
It will not tell you which named games any operator carries, because the data behind this site has no field for games.
It will not report anything as tested with money. Nobody here holds an account with any operator in the table. The two sources are the register entry for a permit and the operator's own terms, both dated, and where neither could be read the cell stays empty. That rule, and the list of everything it left blank, is set out on the page about how these pages are put together.
Questions people actually type
What is a Plinko casino site?
A gambling site whose lobby carries a Plinko board: a triangular grid of pins with a row of payout bins along the bottom, each bin carrying a multiplier the operator publishes before the round. The board itself is not what differs between sites. The permit behind the site, the point at which it asks for identity documents, the ceiling on what leaves the account and the list of countries it refuses are what differ, and those are the five columns in the table on this page.
Does this site know which operators carry Plinko?
Not from its own data, and it does not claim to. The facts library behind this network holds a hundred operators and has no field for games at all — not a title, not a count, not a studio-by-game map. What it does hold is a tag for operators that run an in-house originals suite, which is the category Plinko usually sits in, and that tag is on 20 of the 100. Ten of the eleven operators in the table carry it; the eleventh is the paid placement, whose record carries no tags at all. Which named titles are in that suite is a question this site's data cannot answer, so no page here answers it.
Who publishes the multipliers in the payout row?
The operator, or the studio that built the board for it. The row is a price list printed before the round, not a figure anyone at this site measured or verified. It is symmetrical about the centre, its outermost numbers are the largest printed, and it is rewritten as a whole when the row count or the risk setting changes. Nothing on this site says one row setting is better than another, because that would be a claim about a return no operator publishes.
How many of these operators publish a verification threshold?
Two of the eleven. Bitcasino.io names €2,500 in clause 6.6 of its terms, and Rocketpot names US$2,500 in clause 11.4. The other nine either write that documents may be requested at any time and at the operator's discretion, or publish nothing readable on the point. Across the whole hundred-operator library the figure is five. A blank cell in that column is not permission to withdraw unchecked; it means no amount is written down anywhere, so any amount can trigger the request.
The mark this site publishes under. It is a drawing made for the site and not a capture of anybody’s screen.
Vave
Bitcasino.io
Rocketpot
DuckDice
Metaspins
Rainbet
Shuffle
Wild.io
Wolf.bet
Bitsler