Counted from the cashier
Nine coin lists, from six names to thirteen, and what the length hides
Nine of the eleven operators here publish a list of accepted coins; two do not, and their cells say the list was not read. The lists run from six names to thirteen. Four names appear on almost every one of them, and ten of the twenty-three names in the set appear on exactly one — which is what the length of a coin list is mostly made of.
Nine lists, and two blanks
Nine of the eleven operators in our table publish a list of the coins their cashier accepts. The lengths are: Rocketpot 13, Wolf.bet 13, Wild.io 12, DuckDice 10, Flush 9, Rainbet 9, Metaspins 8, Vave 6, Shuffle 6.
Bitcasino.io and Bitsler have no coin list on file at all.
Their cells print “not published”, which in this column means no list was found in what was read — not that the cashier takes nothing. The same care runs through every column of the comparison table: a blank is a statement about a document, and it is never a zero.
Across the whole hundred-operator library only 30 lists could be read at all, with a median length of 8.5 names, so nine readable lists out of eleven is unusually good coverage rather than the norm.
Four names carry almost every list
Laid side by side, the nine lists hold 86 entries between them and 23 distinct names.
Bitcoin and ether are on all nine. Litecoin is on eight. Tether is on eight literally, and the ninth list uses two chain-specific spellings of the same stablecoin instead of the plain ticker — which is covered below, because it is the most instructive thing in the whole column.
After that the agreement collapses. Dogecoin and tron appear on six lists, bitcoin cash, USDC, XRP and solana on five, cardano and BNB on four, TON on two.
And ten of the twenty-three names appear on exactly one list: DAI, dash, monero, polygon's POL, polkadot's DOT, Optimism's OP, shiba inu, one operator's own token, and the two chain-specific tether spellings.
What the tail of a long list is made of
That last paragraph is the answer to why a thirteen-name list is not twice as useful as a six-name one.
Rocketpot's thirteen include DAI, plus USDTE and USDTT — tether on two different chains, counted as two positions. Written as most operators write it, that list is twelve names, one of which is the same stablecoin the others print once.
Wolf.bet's thirteen include DOT, OP and SHIB: a governance token, a network token and a meme token.
Shuffle's six include SHFL, a token issued by the operator running the cashier. One of the six positions on that list is an asset that exists because the casino created it, which means the list is one name longer than any outside market made it.
None of that is dishonest and none of it is hidden. It is simply what list length measures: positions in a price list, not routes to paying.
The one coin the reputation does not match
There is a name people expect at the top of a crypto casino's list and it is nearly absent.
Monero appears on one of our nine lists — DuckDice's. Across all thirty readable lists in the library it appears twice, on DuckDice and on one operator outside our table.
The gap between what a "crypto casino" is imagined to accept and what the cashiers actually print is wider here than in any other field we read, and it is worth noticing precisely because the coin column is the one operators publish most willingly. Readiness to publish and usefulness of the published thing run in opposite directions across our five columns: the coin list is the fullest and separates least, while the verification threshold is the emptiest and separates most — two figures in eleven, set out under when the documents are asked for.
What the coin does not change
Depositing in a coin does not move any of the other four columns.
It does not move the verification clause: not one of the eleven documents ties the identity request to a payment method, and several tie it explicitly to the withdrawal instead. It does not move the ceiling — all three published ceilings are denominated in dollars or in a dollar-pegged token regardless of what was deposited, as set out under withdrawal ceilings. It does not move the permit, covered under permits and registers. And it does not move the operator's barred-country list, which is written about places rather than payments and runs from 58 names to one across our eleven — the subject of the page on barred countries.
What it does change is what a balance is worth while it waits. A balance held in bitcoin or ether moves against every currency in which those clauses are written; a balance held in a dollar-pegged token mostly does not. That is a property of the coin and not a claim about any operator.
Why this column sits below the others
The board publishes multipliers and the cashier publishes coins, and both are the parts of a gambling site that get printed in large type.
Neither is where these eleven operators actually differ. The board is the same build wherever it appears, as set out on the page about the payout row, and the coin lists agree on the four names that matter and disagree only in their tails.
The columns that differ are the ones nobody advertises: whether the permit number resolves to a register entry, at what point documents are demanded, how much may leave in a period, and how many countries the terms refuse. That is the order this site reads them in.